Antennas · Elevation pattern & takeoff angle
Antenna pattern over ground
How height and ground shape the vertical pattern of a dipole or a vertical: the takeoff angle of the main lobe, its −3 dB elevation range and the nulls, for up to three heights at once. A far-field reflection model, not NEC.
Elevation pattern
Main lobe and nulls
| Height | Takeoff | −3 dB range | Nulls (≤ −20 dB) |
|---|
Takeoff = elevation of the strongest lobe. When lobes tie within 0.05 dB (perfect ground) the lowest is shown. “–zenith” means the lobe continues over the top to the same angle on the far side.
Azimuth pattern
What this model leaves out
This is a far-field reflection model: the direct wave plus one wave reflected from flat, uniform ground, using the plane-wave Fresnel coefficients. It is not NEC. It ignores:
- The ground (surface) wave. Verticals over real ground show a null right at 0°; in reality a ground wave exists there, but it dies off quickly with distance at HF.
- Near-field ground loss under the antenna. That sets a vertical's efficiency (how good the radials are) and a low dipole's loss. Patterns here are shapes, in dB relative to each trace's own peak, not gain.
- Coupling between antenna and ground at low heights. The current is assumed to stay sinusoidal. Below about 0.1 λ this is poor, so heights under 0.1 λ are flagged and under 0.02 λ are refused.
- Terrain, nearby objects, feed-line radiation and wire thickness.
For exact work use a NEC-based program: EZNEC, 4nec2 or MMANA-GAL. For low antennas over real ground, check that the program's ground model covers the ground under the antenna, not only the far-field reflection.
How it works
The ground is described by its complex relative permittivity ε = εr − jσ/(2πfε0) ≈ εr − j60σλ. At elevation ψ the
reflected wave is the incident wave times
Γh = (sinψ − √(ε − cos²ψ)) / (sinψ + √(ε − cos²ψ)) for horizontal polarisation and
Γv = (ε sinψ − √(ε − cos²ψ)) / (ε sinψ + √(ε − cos²ψ)) for vertical polarisation.
A perfect conductor gives Γh = −1 and Γv = +1, the classic image antenna. Real ground gives Γv = −1 at the horizon and a minimum near the pseudo-Brewster angle: that's why verticals over poor ground lose their lowest angles and over sea water keep them. A horizontal dipole at height h over perfect ground has a broadside pattern ∝ |sin(2πh/λ · sinψ)|, so its first lobe peaks where sinψ = λ/(4h): 30° at λ/2, straight up at λ/4.
The pattern is the λ/2 dipole's free-space pattern cos(π/2·cosθ)/sinθ times the ground factor, worked out separately for the horizontally and vertically polarised parts of the field. The ground-mounted λ/4 vertical is integrated along its sinusoidal current. Plots are in dB relative to each trace's own maximum (0 dB = the marked dot), on a linear dB scale down to −30 dB.
- Reflection coefficients: ITU-R Recommendation P.2040-4 (09/2025), §2.2.1.1, eq. 31a (TE) and 31b (TM), with medium 1 = air and incidence angle 90° − ψ.
- Complex permittivity: ITU-R P.527-6 (09/2021) eq. 1b and 3a (ε″ = σ/(2πfε0) = 17.98σ/fGHz); P.2040-4 eq. 9–12.
- Ground constants: ITU-R P.527-6, Attachment to Annex 1, Fig. 24 (curves A–E, values below ~30 MHz): sea water εr 70, σ 5 S/m; fresh water 80, 0.003; wet ground 30, 0.01; medium dry 15, 0.001; very dry 3, 0.0001. Read off a log-scale graph. Above about 30 MHz the land and fresh-water conductivities in that figure rise; use Custom if that matters.
- Half-wave dipole pattern and the image method over a conducting plane: N. K. Nikolova, McMaster University, Lecture 9, eq. 9.43 (λ/2 dipole), 9.61 (vertical element over ground), 9.77 (horizontal element over ground); the same results are in C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory, §4.6 and §4.7 “Ground Effects”.
- Not modelled: ground wave, near-field ground loss, ground coupling at low height. See the box above.